H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristina Brandi vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 1-1

Kristina Brandi and Amanda Coetzer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay, while Kristina Brandi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristina Brandi won the 2000 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristina Brandi
PUR Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kristina Brandi #54 6-1 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data Jan 20, 2000* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Amanda Coetzer #10 2-6 6-0 6-3 Kristina Brandi #89 Match data May 2, 1997* R16 Bol Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristina Brandi #917 #27 983 1,722 104 151 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,052 497 310 61.6% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Brandi Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,674 0 0
18 1995 1–2 33.3% #191 1,499 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #156 1,508 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,685 0 0
20 1997 5–9 35.7% #88 1,529 0 0 1992 37–16 69.8% #17 1,865 0 0
21 1998 4–10 28.6% #71 1,518 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,994 0 2
22 1999 16–18 47.1% #55 1,604 0 1 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,886 0 3
23 2000 25–25 50.0% #27 1,643 0 1 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,907 0 3
24 2001 14–20 41.2% #77 1,630 0 1 1996 32–21 60.4% #14 1,855 0 3
25 2002 3–9 25.0% #207 1,552 0 1 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,014 0 5
26 2003 0–1 0.0% #75 1,539 0 1 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,888 0 6
27 2004 23–21 52.3% #47 1,617 0 1 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,816 0 6
28 2005 8–19 29.6% #89 1,518 0 1 2000 47–23 67.1% #12 1,894 0 7
29 2006 4–14 22.2% #158 1,427 0 1 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,414 0 1 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,794 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristina Brandi Amanda Coetzer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 11 22 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1992 20 8 28 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1998 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 25 8 33 75.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2000 13 14 27 48.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 27 7 34 79.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 2003 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 16 11 27 59.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2004 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 23 14 37 62.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2005 3 13 16 18.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 13 11 24 54.2% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 20 13 33 60.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 11 28 60.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 87 151 42.4% 16 41 57 28.1% 24 19 43 55.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — 265 165 430 61.6% 165 83 248 66.5% 23 24 47 48.9% 44 38 82 53.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristina Brandi Amanda Coetzer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1537 112.0 — — — — — +42 — 63.6% +0.55 0–1 — — +0.21
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1674 132.8 — — — — -18 -17 -126 56.3% +0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 -0.21
18 1995 1499 102.4 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — -0.24 1990 1662 126.6 — — — — +9 -10 -107 44.4% -0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 102.4 -1.00
19 1996 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.24 1991 1685 139.7 — — — — -8 -8 -103 44.6% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -1.77
20 1997 1529 115.8 — — — — -5 +24 +109 42.4% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 100.7 +0.26 1992 1865 153.9 — — — — -32 +16 — 64.1% +1.07 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.99
21 1998 1518 107.5 — — — — +31 -23 — 32.3% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.22 1993 1994 160.0 — — — — +10 -32 -406 65.4% +0.99 9–5 (64%) 4–10 (29%) 99.0 +1.59
22 1999 1604 122.3 — — — — -34 -147 +116 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.67 1994 1886 153.6 — — — — -4 +95 -255 65.1% +1.19 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +1.72
23 2000 1644 129.1 — — — — -43 -159 +189 51.4% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 105.3 +1.89 1995 1907 160.6 — — — — 0 +74 — 53.3% +0.22 13–7 (65%) 4–3 (57%) 103.6 -2.38
24 2001 1630 117.9 — — — — -50 -195 +257 43.1% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.1 +0.42 1996 1856 161.7 — — — — +2 +111 — 60.2% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
25 2002 1552 114.8 — — — — +3 -116 — 32.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.61 1997 2014 167.3 — — — — -43 +103 — 64.8% +1.14 18–7 (72%) 10–7 (59%) 107.6 +0.54
26 2003 1540 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1998 1888 157.3 — — — — +20 +176 -212 56.7% +0.43 9–10 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 +0.82
27 2004 1618 131.3 -1.60 -0.84 0.869 47.0% +2 -200 — 53.5% +0.43 7–8 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.57 1999 1816 156.1 — — — — +61 +90 -116 53.8% +0.19 16–7 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 101.8 +0.50
28 2005 1518 111.7 -1.87 +1.60 0.982 49.7% -23 -44 +214 34.9% -1.00 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.1 -0.48 2000 1895 157.2 — — — — -11 +100 -198 65.4% +1.19 8–10 (44%) 9–5 (64%) 97.8 +0.42
29 2006 1427 98.1 -3.07 -3.33 0.780 44.5% +40 -7 — 30.0% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.8 +0.22 2001 1786 143.1 — — — — -8 +200 -64 56.5% +0.63 12–8 (60%) 7–5 (58%) 99.6 +2.01
30 2007 1415 98.2 -2.95 -1.16 0.802 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — -0.13 2002 1795 147.3 — — — — +44 +76 -128 57.0% +0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–3 (57%) 102.2 +1.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1739 139.6 +0.81 +0.45 0.979 49.4% +19 +138 -49 54.6% +0.36 11–5 (69%) 4–5 (44%) 101.8 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1718 114.7 -0.37 +1.49 1.105 52.2% +32 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 — — -0.28
Career — 1722 124.0 -2.31 -0.88 0.872 46.9% -15 -110 +183 44.1% -0.34 32–43 (43%) 23–23 (50%) 100.5 +0.69 — 2052 159.5 +0.47 +0.75 1.018 50.2% +4 +80 -161 58.5% +0.63 138–98 (58%) 73–67 (52%) 100.2 +0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.