H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 1-0
Kristina Brandi holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristina Brandi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristina Brandi won the 2004 Indian Wells first round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Kristina Brandi | 6-2 6-0 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Denisa Chladkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |