H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Iva Majoli H2H: 0-4
Iva Majoli holds a 4–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-4 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-4 6-4 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-2 7-6(7) | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| May 26, 2000* | Madrid | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-3 5-7 7-6(1) | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |