H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristina Brandi vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-2

Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Toyota Princess Cup quarterfinal 1-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristina Brandi
PUR Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Julie Halard-Decugis
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Halard-Decugis #19 1-6 6-1 6-4 Kristina Brandi #30 Match data Oct 7, 2000* QF Toyota Princess Cup Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Julie Halard-Decugis #27 6-0 6-1 Kristina Brandi #82 Match data Nov 21, 1998* SF Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristina Brandi #917 #27 983 1,722 104 151 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Julie Halard-Decugis #15 #7 2,030 2,024 340 221 60.6% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Brandi Julie Halard-Decugis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 9–5 64.3% #62 1,643 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 11–15 42.3% #75 1,612 0 0
18 1995 1–2 33.3% #191 1,499 0 0 1989 10–16 38.5% #118 1,624 0 0
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #156 1,508 0 0 1990 20–16 55.6% #41 1,707 0 0
20 1997 5–9 35.7% #88 1,529 0 0 1991 44–23 65.7% #20 1,820 0 1
21 1998 4–10 28.6% #71 1,518 0 0 1992 23–14 62.2% #27 1,819 0 2
22 1999 16–18 47.1% #55 1,604 0 1 1993 26–18 59.1% #29 1,819 0 2
23 2000 25–25 50.0% #27 1,643 0 1 1994 38–21 64.4% #21 1,889 0 3
24 2001 14–20 41.2% #77 1,630 0 1 1995 19–15 55.9% #50 1,770 0 4
25 2002 3–9 25.0% #207 1,552 0 1 1996 28–10 73.7% #20 1,856 0 6
26 2003 0–1 0.0% #75 1,539 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #178 1,843 0 6
27 2004 23–21 52.3% #47 1,617 0 1 1998 34–21 61.8% #22 1,916 0 8
28 2005 8–19 29.6% #89 1,518 0 1 1999 47–22 68.1% #9 1,930 0 10
29 2006 4–14 22.2% #158 1,427 0 1 2000 31–24 56.4% #15 1,837 0 12
30 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,414 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristina Brandi Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1991 26 13 39 66.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1998 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1993 19 11 30 63.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2000 13 14 27 48.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 19 14 33 57.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 8 8 16 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 13 4 17 76.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2003 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 18 12 30 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2005 3 13 16 18.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 22 11 33 66.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 18 13 31 58.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 87 151 42.4% 16 41 57 28.1% 24 19 43 55.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — 164 109 273 60.1% 117 62 179 65.4% 31 17 48 64.6% 28 33 61 45.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristina Brandi Julie Halard-Decugis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1643 124.0 — — — — -39 +21 — 58.8% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.7 +1.12
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1612 123.0 — — — — -40 +60 -85 45.0% -0.08 3–5 (38%) 2–7 (22%) 95.8 -0.31
18 1995 1499 102.4 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — -0.24 1989 1625 118.1 — — — — -29 -13 — 39.7% -0.70 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 -0.36
19 1996 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.24 1990 1708 138.4 — — — — -46 +7 -172 52.9% +0.32 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 -1.86
20 1997 1529 115.8 — — — — -5 +24 +109 42.4% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 100.7 +0.26 1991 1821 141.7 — — — — -31 +28 -239 59.2% +0.73 18–5 (78%) 5–1 (83%) 112.4 +1.15
21 1998 1518 107.5 — — — — +31 -23 — 32.3% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.22 1992 1819 144.0 — — — — -103 +139 -169 57.1% +0.49 8–2 (80%) 3–5 (38%) 104.1 -1.82
22 1999 1604 122.3 — — — — -34 -147 +116 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.67 1993 1819 145.9 — — — — +15 +29 — 59.2% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 105.4 +1.92
23 2000 1644 129.1 — — — — -43 -159 +189 51.4% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 105.3 +1.89 1994 1890 153.5 — — — — -51 +106 — 60.0% +0.46 14–8 (64%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 -0.05
24 2001 1630 117.9 — — — — -50 -195 +257 43.1% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.1 +0.42 1995 1771 131.9 — — — — -28 +220 — 55.1% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.1 +0.60
25 2002 1552 114.8 — — — — +3 -116 — 32.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.61 1996 1856 152.1 — — — — -18 +132 — 69.0% +1.29 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 -0.28
26 2003 1540 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 1997 1843 108.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
27 2004 1618 131.3 -1.60 -0.84 0.869 47.0% +2 -200 — 53.5% +0.43 7–8 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.57 1998 1917 157.6 — — — — -29 +48 -109 60.5% +0.78 7–7 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 100.1 -3.44
28 2005 1518 111.7 -1.87 +1.60 0.982 49.7% -23 -44 +214 34.9% -1.00 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.1 -0.48 1999 1930 160.9 — — — — -32 +91 -17 63.8% +0.88 14–5 (74%) 8–4 (67%) 110.3 +0.13
29 2006 1427 98.1 -3.07 -3.33 0.780 44.5% +40 -7 — 30.0% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.8 +0.22 2000 1837 145.6 — — — — +5 +79 +214 52.5% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 102.6 +1.49
30 2007 1415 98.2 -2.95 -1.16 0.802 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1722 124.0 -2.31 -0.88 0.872 46.9% -15 -110 +183 44.1% -0.34 32–43 (43%) 23–23 (50%) 100.5 +0.69 — 2024 152.3 — — — — -27 +76 -46 57.5% +0.49 110–64 (63%) 67–50 (57%) 111.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.