H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2006 Charleston third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 6-4 6-4 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |