H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristina Brandi vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-1

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2006 Charleston Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristina Brandi
PUR Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #50 6-4 6-4 Kristina Brandi #104 Match data Apr 13, 2006* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristina Brandi #917 #27 983 1,722 104 151 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Brandi Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 1–2 33.3% #191 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #156 1,508 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 1997 5–9 35.7% #88 1,529 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 1998 4–10 28.6% #71 1,518 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 1999 16–18 47.1% #55 1,604 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2000 25–25 50.0% #27 1,643 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2001 14–20 41.2% #77 1,630 0 1 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2002 3–9 25.0% #207 1,552 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2003 0–1 0.0% #75 1,539 0 1 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2004 23–21 52.3% #47 1,617 0 1 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2005 8–19 29.6% #89 1,518 0 1 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2006 4–14 22.2% #158 1,427 0 1 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,414 0 1 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristina Brandi Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 13 14 27 48.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 13 16 18.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 87 151 42.4% 16 41 57 28.1% 24 19 43 55.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristina Brandi Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1499 102.4 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.24 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 1997 1529 115.8 — — — — -5 +24 +109 42.4% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 100.7 +0.26 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 1998 1518 107.5 — — — — +31 -23 — 32.3% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.22 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 1999 1604 122.3 — — — — -34 -147 +116 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.67 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2000 1644 129.1 — — — — -43 -159 +189 51.4% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 105.3 +1.89 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2001 1630 117.9 — — — — -50 -195 +257 43.1% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.1 +0.42 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2002 1552 114.8 — — — — +3 -116 — 32.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.61 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2003 1540 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2004 1618 131.3 -1.60 -0.84 0.869 47.0% +2 -200 — 53.5% +0.43 7–8 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.57 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2005 1518 111.7 -1.87 +1.60 0.982 49.7% -23 -44 +214 34.9% -1.00 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.1 -0.48 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2006 1427 98.1 -3.07 -3.33 0.780 44.5% +40 -7 — 30.0% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.8 +0.22 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2007 1415 98.2 -2.95 -1.16 0.802 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — -0.13 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 1722 124.0 -2.31 -0.88 0.872 46.9% -15 -110 +183 44.1% -0.34 32–43 (43%) 23–23 (50%) 100.5 +0.69 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.