H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristina Brandi vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1

Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2000 US Open second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristina Brandi
PUR Age 49 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-1 Kristina Brandi #34 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristina Brandi #917 #27 983 1,722 104 151 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristina Brandi Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 — — — — — — — 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1995 1–2 33.3% #191 1,499 0 0 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 1996 1–1 50.0% #156 1,508 0 0 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 1997 5–9 35.7% #88 1,529 0 0 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 1998 4–10 28.6% #71 1,518 0 0 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 1999 16–18 47.1% #55 1,604 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2000 25–25 50.0% #27 1,643 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2001 14–20 41.2% #77 1,630 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2002 3–9 25.0% #207 1,552 0 1 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 2003 0–1 0.0% #75 1,539 0 1 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43
27 2004 23–21 52.3% #47 1,617 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 8–19 29.6% #89 1,518 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 4–14 22.2% #158 1,427 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,414 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristina Brandi Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1998 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 13 14 27 48.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2003 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
27 2004 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 13 16 18.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 87 151 42.4% 16 41 57 28.1% 24 19 43 55.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristina Brandi Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 1995 1499 102.4 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — -0.24 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79
19 1996 1509 106.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.24 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 1997 1529 115.8 — — — — -5 +24 +109 42.4% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 100.7 +0.26 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 1998 1518 107.5 — — — — +31 -23 — 32.3% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.22 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 1999 1604 122.3 — — — — -34 -147 +116 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1644 129.1 — — — — -43 -159 +189 51.4% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 105.3 +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1630 117.9 — — — — -50 -195 +257 43.1% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.1 +0.42 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2002 1552 114.8 — — — — +3 -116 — 32.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.61 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 2003 1540 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36
27 2004 1618 131.3 -1.60 -0.84 0.869 47.0% +2 -200 — 53.5% +0.43 7–8 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 100.4 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1518 111.7 -1.87 +1.60 0.982 49.7% -23 -44 +214 34.9% -1.00 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 96.1 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1427 98.1 -3.07 -3.33 0.780 44.5% +40 -7 — 30.0% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.8 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1415 98.2 -2.95 -1.16 0.802 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1722 124.0 -2.31 -0.88 0.872 46.9% -15 -110 +183 44.1% -0.34 32–43 (43%) 23–23 (50%) 100.5 +0.69 — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.