H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Milagros Sequera H2H: 1-1
Kristina Brandi and Milagros Sequera are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milagros Sequera leads 1–0 on clay, while Kristina Brandi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milagros Sequera won the 2006 Prague third round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Milagros Sequera | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kristina Brandi | 6-1 6-2 | Milagros Sequera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Milagros Sequera | #1,060 | #48 | 537 | 1,629 | 32 | 51 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Milagros Sequera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #77 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #103 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #74 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |