H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 0-2
Miriam Oremans holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2001 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2001* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Miriam Oremans | 6-4 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| May 11, 2000* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Miriam Oremans | 2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |