H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-1
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1998 Key Biscayne second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 7-5 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |