H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristina Brandi vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 0-1
Nuria Llagostera Vives holds a 1–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nuria Llagostera Vives leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nuria Llagostera Vives won the 2005 Roland Garros second round 7-6(2) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nuria Llagostera Vives | 7-6(2) 6-0 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Brandi | Nuria Llagostera Vives | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |