H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristine Kunce vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 1-0
Kristine Kunce holds a 1–0 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristine Kunce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristine Kunce won the 1996 Birmingham second round 5-7 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1996* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Kristine Kunce | 5-7 6-0 6-3 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristine Kunce | #572 | #45 | 205 | 1,765 | 46 | 63 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristine Kunce | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #168 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #56 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #221 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #121 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |