H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Kristine Kunce vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Kristine Kunce holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristine Kunce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristine Kunce won the 1995 Birmingham round of 32 0-6 6-1 6-4.

AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kristine Kunce #104 0-6 6-1 6-4 Nancy Feber #109 Match data Jun 15, 1995* R32 Birmingham Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristine Kunce #572 #45 205 1,742 46 63 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristine Kunce Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1988 0–2 0.0% #242 1,467 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1989 4–2 66.7% #168 1,557 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1990 0–4 0.0% #279 1,505 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1991 1–2 33.3% #172 1,505 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1992 2–2 50.0% #177 1,515 0 0
23 1993 8–8 50.0% #96 1,573 0 0
24 1994 19–17 52.8% #56 1,694 0 0
25 1995 4–13 23.5% #221 1,547 0 0
26 1996 3–3 50.0% #170 1,576 0 0
27 1997 4–5 44.4% #121 1,591 0 0
28 1998 1–5 16.7% #260 1,540 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristine Kunce Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 4 2 6 66.7% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1992 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1995 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
28 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 17 39 56 30.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 26 15 41 63.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristine Kunce Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1502 100.0 50.0% -0.25 +0.25
17 1993 1487 111.8 +51 26.9% -1.54 1–1 -0.06
18 1988 1468 95.5 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 +0.31 1994 1483 105.3 -15 +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.24
19 1989 1558 138.9 +88 60.0% +1.27 2–1 (67%) 1–1 -0.22 1995 1550 117.2 -78 +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 +0.43
20 1990 1505 94.7 -31 11.1% -3.11 0–1 +0.17 1996 1513 113.7 -89 +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1991 1505 96.5 0.0% -3.75 +0.11 1997 1516 106.1 -48 40.0% -0.70 2–2 (50%) +0.12
22 1992 1515 103.1 60.0% +0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.28
23 1993 1573 110.4 -63 +171 50.0% -0.61 3–3 (50%) 2–0 +0.39
24 1994 1695 130.6 -104 +113 49.4% +0.20 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 102.7 -0.53
25 1995 1547 97.1 -59 +206 27.5% -1.70 3–3 (50%) 0–1 +0.77
26 1996 1576 107.4 +247 42.9% +0.07 2–0 0–1 -0.15
27 1997 1591 111.1 -150 +292 45.0% -0.20 1–1 0–1 +0.47
28 1998 1541 98.7 -139 21.4% -1.86 1–1 1–0 +0.19
Career 1742 119.1 -88 +168 42.1% -0.50 20–18 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 102.6 +1.66 1567 115.2 -40 +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.