H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 0-1
Kiki Bertens holds a 1–0 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2018 US Open first round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 6-0 7-5 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristyna Pliskova | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |