H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-2
Monica Puig holds a 2–1 lead over Kristyna Pliskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Monica Puig leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Kristyna Pliskova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2019 Luxembourg fourth round 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Monica Puig | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6) | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
| May 25, 2017* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-2 6-3 | Monica Puig | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Monica Puig | 4-6 7-6 9-7 | Kristyna Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristyna Pliskova | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |