H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ksenia Pervak vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Ksenia Pervak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2011 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Tamira Paszek | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ksenia Pervak | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |