H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kym Ruddell vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 1-0

Kym Ruddell holds a 1–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kym Ruddell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kym Ruddell won the 1977 Atlanta round of 32 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kym Ruddell
AUS Age 71
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Iris Riedel Kuhn
FRG Age 72

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kym Ruddell 6-1 6-2 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data Feb 17, 1977* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kym Ruddell — — — 1,648 39 47 45.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Iris Riedel Kuhn — — — 1,845 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kym Ruddell Iris Riedel Kuhn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1972 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
19 1975 7–9 43.8% — 1,499 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
20 1976 5–4 55.6% — 1,533 0 1 1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,490 0 0
21 1977 11–12 47.8% — 1,564 0 1 1975 16–13 55.2% — 1,684 0 0
22 1978 7–10 41.2% — 1,545 0 1 1976 10–15 40.0% — 1,679 0 0
23 1979 7–7 50.0% — 1,591 0 1 1977 13–14 48.1% — 1,706 0 0
24 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,571 0 1 1978 13–10 56.5% — 1,694 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1979 5–9 35.7% — 1,685 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1980 28–9 75.7% — 1,820 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 1981 15–13 53.6% — 1,730 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1982 1–6 14.3% — 1,627 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kym Ruddell Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1975 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1976 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1975 — — — — 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
23 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1980 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1978 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 2 5 7 28.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — 1 5 6 16.7% 81 62 143 56.6% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kym Ruddell Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1974 1488 96.8 — — — — — — +46 37.5% -1.00 1–1 — — +0.43 1972 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.37
19 1975 1500 109.9 — — — — — +40 +27 45.9% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — +1.40 1973 1479 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
20 1976 1533 98.8 — — — — — +37 +6 50.0% -0.55 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.78 1974 1491 113.8 — — — — — +14 — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — +0.12
21 1977 1564 112.9 — — — — +51 +32 -62 44.9% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 107.2 +3.62 1975 1685 137.0 — — — — -42 +13 — 53.7% +0.22 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 104.4 -0.17
22 1978 1546 104.9 — — — — +73 — -94 43.2% -0.70 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — +1.31 1976 1680 125.4 — — — — -69 +22 — 41.4% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — -0.74
23 1979 1591 110.0 — — — — — — -49 45.2% -0.74 3–0 (100%) 3–1 (75%) 105.4 +1.30 1977 1706 135.3 — — — — -154 +71 — 48.4% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 -1.31
24 1980 1571 97.8 — — — — — — -62 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 1978 1694 124.7 — — — — -99 -10 -173 58.5% +0.91 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +2.71
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1685 123.5 — — — — — +33 — 41.9% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -1.31
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1820 140.6 — — — — — +136 — 72.7% +1.95 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 +1.28
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1730 122.0 — — — — — +227 — 51.7% -0.26 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 -0.12
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1627 97.1 — — — — — +128 — 29.4% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.33
Career — 1649 109.1 — — — — +61 +37 -30 44.4% -0.49 16–10 (62%) 10–5 (67%) 108.6 +11.36 — 1845 136.1 — — — — -86 +85 -173 52.5% +0.14 28–32 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 99.6 +0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.