H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Kyung-Mi Chang vs Ansley Cargill H2H: 0-1

Ansley Cargill holds a 1–0 lead over Kyung-Mi Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ansley Cargill leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ansley Cargill won the 2002 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-3 7-6(2).

KOR Age 44 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 44 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ansley Cargill #133 6-3 7-6(2) Kyung-Mi Chang #341 Match data Oct 3, 2002* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kyung-Mi Chang — #254 117 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ansley Cargill — #90 400 1,564 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kyung-Mi Chang Ansley Cargill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #268 1,484 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #232 1,476 0 0
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #311 1,483 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #122 1,484 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2003 4–9 30.8% #110 1,475 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #241 1,463 0 0
23 2005 0–1 0.0% #454 1,471 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #301 1,453 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kyung-Mi Chang Ansley Cargill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 12 15 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kyung-Mi Chang Ansley Cargill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1484 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1477 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
20 2002 1483 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.12 2002 1485 113.6 — — — — +22 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 -0.18
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1475 100.9 -3.24 -2.26 0.507 35.7% +2 +72 — 27.6% -1.93 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.51
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1463 107.6 +1.85 -2.17 0.535 42.3% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.12
23 2005 1472 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 2005 1454 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
Career — 1500 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +5.00 — 1564 108.0 -1.97 -2.24 0.512 37.4% +13 +72 — 27.3% -1.67 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.