H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 2-1
Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–1 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1993 Schenectady fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 7-6 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Claudia Porwik | 6-0 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1990* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 6-4 6-4 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |