H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-0

Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1988 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #17 6-1 6-3 Emiko Okagawa Match data Aug 17, 1988* R64 Canadian Open Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Larisa Savchenko Emiko Okagawa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0
16 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
17 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
18 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0
20 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0
21 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0
22 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0
23 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0
24 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
26 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
27 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0
28 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Larisa Savchenko Emiko Okagawa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0% — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Larisa Savchenko Emiko Okagawa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
16 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
17 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03
18 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41
19 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75
20 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
21 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89
22 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14
23 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03
24 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10
26 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22
27 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
28 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84 — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.