H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-2
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1992 Oakland third round 7-6 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 7-6 3-6 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1988* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Helen Kelesi | 7-6 6-0 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1986* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |