H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 2-0
Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–0 lead over Isabel Cueto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1992 Auckland third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1992* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-4 6-3 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
| May 31, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Larisa Savchenko | 6-0 7-5 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |