H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Jana Novotna H2H: 2-2
Larisa Savchenko and Jana Novotna are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1995 Key Biscayne fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1993* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 7-5 6-3 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
| May 2, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-0 6-1 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1991* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 6-4 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Jana Novotna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |