H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-6

Judith Wiesner holds a 6–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1997 Berlin third round 7-6 6-1.

URS 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
AUT Age 60 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 15, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Judith Wiesner #18 7-6 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #64 Match data
Mar 23, 1996* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Judith Wiesner #26 1-6 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #70 Match data
Aug 28, 1994* Schenectady WTA 250 F Hard Judith Wiesner #29 7-5 3-6 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #43 Match data
Mar 13, 1994* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Judith Wiesner #21 7-5 6-0 Larisa Savchenko #54 Match data
Aug 28, 1993* Schenectady WTA 250 QF Hard Larisa Savchenko #42 6-7 6-3 6-2 Judith Wiesner #22 Match data
Jun 28, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Judith Wiesner #21 6-3 6-0 Larisa Savchenko #76 Match data
Sep 2, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Judith Wiesner #15 6-1 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Judith Wiesner #48 #12 1,590 1,979 302 177 63.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Larisa Savchenko Judith Wiesner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1983 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0 1986 3–3 50.0% #141 1,514 0 0
1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0 1987 19–13 59.4% #33 1,696 0 0
1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0 1988 22–17 56.4% #33 1,751 0 1
1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0 1989 22–14 61.1% #35 1,736 0 2
1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0 1990 41–19 68.3% #17 1,845 0 2
1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0 1991 28–14 66.7% #16 1,962 0 2
1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0 1992 29–17 63.0% #25 1,916 0 3
1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1 1993 30–17 63.8% #21 1,906 0 3
1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1 1994 28–15 65.1% #25 1,893 0 4
1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2 1995 28–14 66.7% #25 1,914 0 5
1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 1996 35–22 61.4% #15 1,925 0 5
1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2 1997 17–11 60.7% #48 1,829 0 5
1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2