H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-1

Larisa Savchenko and Kimiko Date Krumm are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass, while Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Indian Wells fourth round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 12, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-0 Larisa Savchenko #79 Match data
Jun 26, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Larisa Savchenko #58 6-3 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Larisa Savchenko Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8