H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-1

Larisa Savchenko and Laura Arraya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1993 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Laura Arraya
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #37 6-3 6-3 Laura Arraya #62 Match data Mar 14, 1993* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Laura Arraya #24 6-0 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #52 Match data May 14, 1992* R32 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Larisa Savchenko Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0 1981 19–8 70.4% — 1,685 0 4
18 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0 1982 33–17 66.0% — 1,741 0 7
19 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0 1983 23–23 50.0% — 1,712 0 7
20 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,759 0 8
21 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Larisa Savchenko Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0% — 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Larisa Savchenko Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25 1981 1685 129.1 — — — — -70 — — 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) — -1.24
18 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.37 1982 1742 126.9 — — — — -61 -27 — 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.71
19 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.29 1983 1713 125.7 — — — — +8 +30 — 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.84
20 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.13 1984 1760 130.6 — — — — -102 +141 -132 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.94
21 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) — -2.81 1985 1692 124.9 — — — — -2 +60 — 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.84
22 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.82 1986 1718 138.1 — — — — -26 +100 — 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.79
23 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.20 1987 1770 133.4 — — — — -31 -11 -184 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.60
24 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.79 1989 1883 136.8 — — — — -8 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.41
26 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.11 1990 1821 141.9 — — — — +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.41
27 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) — -3.68 1991 1823 132.7 — — — — +13 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.96
28 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.43 1992 1733 139.0 — — — — +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.62
29 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58 1993 1682 125.0 — — — — +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 — -0.06
30 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84 — 1923 138.4 — — — — -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.