H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-1
Larisa Savchenko and Laura Golarsa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Golarsa won the 1994 Hobart third round 2-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1994* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Golarsa | 2-6 7-6 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |