H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Maja Zivec Skulj H2H: 1-0
Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Maja Zivec Skulj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1991 St. Petersburg third round 5-7 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 52
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1991* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Maja Zivec Skulj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Maja Zivec Skulj | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Maja Zivec Skulj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |