H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 3-0
Larisa Savchenko holds a 3–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1990 Tokyo Pan Pacific fourth round 4-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1990* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1989* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 7-5 6-2 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 6-4 6-2 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |