H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-2
Larisa Savchenko and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1992 Sydney second round 6-3 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1992* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 1-6 7-6 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1991* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 6-4 7-6 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1988* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-1 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |