H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1997 Indian Wells third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 1997* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #14 6-3 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #59 Match data
Aug 28, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-3 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #75 Match data
Feb 19, 1988* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Hard Larisa Savchenko #27 3-6 6-3 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #20 Match data
Sep 4, 1987* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #25 6-1 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #23 Match data
Feb 19, 1987* Boca Raton WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #28 6-2 6-1 Larisa Savchenko #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Larisa Savchenko Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7