H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-1
Larisa Savchenko and Nana Smith are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1991 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1991* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 6-4 6-4 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1989* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nana Smith | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |