H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-1

Larisa Savchenko and Nana Smith are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1991 St. Petersburg round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #84 6-4 6-4 Nana Smith #126 Match data Sep 27, 1991* R16 St. Petersburg Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Nana Smith #200 5-7 7-5 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #16 Match data Feb 3, 1989* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Larisa Savchenko Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0
30 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Larisa Savchenko Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Larisa Savchenko Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
30 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.