H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 3-0
Larisa Savchenko holds a 3–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1994 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1994* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 7-6 6-3 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| May 1, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 6-2 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |