H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-1
Larisa Savchenko and Stephanie Rehe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 1–0 on carpet, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Chicago third round 3-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1988* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 3-6 6-4 7-6 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 1-6 6-4 8-6 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |