H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Larisa Savchenko vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-0

Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1992 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Larisa Savchenko
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Larisa Savchenko #56 6-2 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Mar 15, 1992* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Larisa Savchenko Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0
22 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0
24 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0
25 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0
26 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0
27 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0
28 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0
29 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Larisa Savchenko Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1988 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0% — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Larisa Savchenko Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1983 1498 109.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1507 116.6 — — — — — +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +0.25 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
18 1985 1674 126.0 — — — — -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 1752 135.5 — — — — -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1987 1793 136.6 — — — — -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1988 1870 156.5 — — — — -44 — +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1989 1862 145.0 — — — — +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1990 1707 132.7 — — — — -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 1991 1699 122.6 — — — — +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 1992 1721 141.5 — — — — +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 1993 1753 140.6 — — — — +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 1994 1809 144.2 — — — — -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 1995 1650 126.3 — — — — +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
29 1996 1668 126.6 — — — — -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 1621 121.0 — — — — +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 1653 111.5 — — — — -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 1586 92.7 — — — — -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1927 142.7 — — — — -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84 — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.