H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-1
Larisa Savchenko and Tina Mochizuki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Mochizuki won the 1986 Indianapolis Indoors third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1986* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tina Mochizuki | 6-2 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1986* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-4 6-1 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |