H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Larisa Savchenko vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 0-1
Wiltrud Probst holds a 1–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1996 Amelia Island third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 7-5 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Larisa Savchenko | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |