H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 2-1
Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1990 Albuquerque fourth round 6-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1990* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 7-5 6-4 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1987* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-4 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Arraya | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |