H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-0
Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1992 Wimbledon second round 3-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Laura Arraya | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Arraya | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |