H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Liliana Giussani H2H: 2-1
Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Liliana Giussani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Liliana Giussani won the 1982 Sao Paulo round-robin match 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1982 | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Liliana Giussani | 7-5 7-6 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1982* | Curitiba | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-3 6-2 | Liliana Giussani | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1981* | Metz | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Laura Arraya | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Liliana Giussani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Liliana Giussani | — | — | — | 1,700 | 31 | 24 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Arraya | Liliana Giussani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |