H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Linda Ferrando H2H: 1-2
Linda Ferrando holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Linda Ferrando leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Ferrando won the 1992 Rome second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 60
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Linda Ferrando | 6-1 6-2 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 7-5 6-4 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1989* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Linda Ferrando | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Linda Ferrando | #474 | #36 | 42 | 1,734 | 87 | 101 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Arraya | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #154 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #67 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #44 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #67 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |