H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-1
Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1987 Wimbledon first round 7-5 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Laura Arraya | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| May 13, 1987* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-2 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1985* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Arraya | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |