H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Sheila Mcinerney H2H: 2-0
Laura Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Sheila Mcinerney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1982 Porto Alegre quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 68
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1982* | Porto Alegre | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-2 6-3 | Sheila Mcinerney | Match data |
| Mar 27, 1982* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Laura Arraya | 7-6 6-4 | Sheila Mcinerney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Sheila Mcinerney | — | — | — | 1,585 | 27 | 39 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Arraya | Sheila Mcinerney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |