H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-1
Laura Arraya and Stephanie Rehe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 1–0 on carpet, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1990 Oakland fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1990* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1984* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-7 6-0 6-3 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Arraya | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |