H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Laura Arraya vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 3-0
Laura Arraya holds a 3–0 lead over Susan Sloane Lundy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1992 Schenectady third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-3 7-5 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1990* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-2 6-2 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Laura Arraya | 6-3 7-5 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Arraya | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |