H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Dupont vs Annabel Croft H2H: 0-1

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1982 Birmingham round of 64 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 6-3 7-5 Laura Dupont Match data Jun 9, 1982* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Dupont Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1
19 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1
20 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1
21 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1
22 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,839 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,730 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,717 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,638 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,591 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Dupont Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3% — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Dupont Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
22 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 1839 143.1 — — — — -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 1730 130.7 — — — — -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1816 142.5 — — — — -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1718 128.9 — — — — -37 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1638 117.4 — — — — +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1593 108.3 — — — — +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1592 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 136.1 — — — — -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61 — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.