H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Annabel Croft H2H: 0-1
Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1982 Birmingham second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1982* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Annabel Croft | 6-3 7-5 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |