H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Beth Norton H2H: 1-4
Beth Norton holds a 4–1 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Beth Norton leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Beth Norton won the 1981 Tokyo Borden fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1981* | Tokyo Borden | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Beth Norton | 6-2 7-6 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1981* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Beth Norton | 6-3 6-3 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1980* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Laura Dupont | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Beth Norton | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1978* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Beth Norton | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1976* | Westchester | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Beth Norton | 6-1 6-2 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Beth Norton | #267 | #233 | 1 | 1,816 | 62 | 93 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Beth Norton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–17 | 26.1% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |