H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 4-2
Laura Dupont holds a 4–2 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Laura Dupont leads 2–0 on carpet, while Betty Ann Grubb leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1980 Boston third round 6-2 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1980* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Dupont | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1980* | Kansas City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Dupont | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1975* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Dupont | 5-7 7-6 6-1 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1974* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1974* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Dupont | 7-6 7-5 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1968* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-2 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Dupont | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |