H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Laura Dupont vs Betty Stove H2H: 1-2
Betty Stove holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on carpet, while Betty Stove leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1980 Houston third round 6-2 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 81
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1980* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Dupont | 6-2 3-6 7-6 | Betty Stove | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1977* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Betty Stove | 6-2 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Betty Stove | 7-5 6-4 | Laura Dupont | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Dupont | — | — | — | 1,893 | 216 | 244 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Laura Dupont | Betty Stove | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1972 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1974 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1975 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1977 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1978 | 24–25 | 49.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1979 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1980 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1981 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1982 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 |