H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Laura Dupont vs Heidi Eisterlehner H2H: 2-1

Laura Dupont holds a 2–1 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on carpet, while Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1981 Chicago round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heidi Eisterlehner 6-4 6-3 Laura Dupont Match data Jan 28, 1981* R64 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Laura Dupont 6-1 6-4 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data May 15, 1977* F Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay
Laura Dupont 6-0 6-1 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Nov 27, 1976* SF South African Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,769 114 130 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Dupont Heidi Eisterlehner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
20 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0
21 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
23 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0
24 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0
25 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2
26 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,653 0 2
27 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,612 0 2
28 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,840 0 5 1978 14–16 46.7% — 1,605 0 2
29 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,732 0 5 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,594 0 2
30 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6 1980 27–18 60.0% — 1,706 0 3
31 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,718 0 6 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,636 0 3
32 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,639 0 6 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3
33 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 6 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,552 0 3
34 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,592 0 6 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Dupont Heidi Eisterlehner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — —
27 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
29 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
31 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9% 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
32 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — —
33 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3% — 8 10 18 44.4% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 19 42 54.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Dupont Heidi Eisterlehner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13
20 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52
21 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.82
23 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.42 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.68
24 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.79 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.79
25 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.48 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.81
26 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.59 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -101 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.87
27 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -179 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.21 1977 1612 114.1 — — — — — +52 -147 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.82
28 1977 1840 143.1 — — — — -95 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -3.41 1978 1605 119.3 — — — — +79 +51 -122 49.3% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +2.70
29 1978 1732 131.1 — — — — -26 +50 -51 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 +1.56 1979 1594 107.1 — — — — +95 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 +1.59
30 1979 1817 142.7 — — — — -23 -30 -121 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 +0.32 1980 1707 133.4 — — — — +7 +67 — 62.6% +0.85 5–8 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +1.99
31 1980 1719 129.1 — — — — -35 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -3.14 1981 1637 110.6 — — — — +67 +56 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.47
32 1981 1639 117.4 — — — — +55 +7 +66 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.30 1982 1548 102.2 — — — — +97 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.18
33 1982 1594 108.3 — — — — +93 -39 +48 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.25 1983 1553 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.35
34 1983 1593 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31 1984 1536 106.9 — — — — +81 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.33
Career — 1896 136.3 — — — — -33 -4 -73 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.73 — 1769 120.8 — — — — +49 +43 -114 47.9% -0.29 38–42 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.5 +7.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.