H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Laura Dupont vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-1

Laura Dupont holds a 2–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1978 Indianapolis round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 6-0 Laura Dupont Match data Aug 10, 1978* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Laura Dupont 6-7 1-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Jan 2, 1978 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Laura Dupont 6-4 4-6 10-8 Kate Latham Match data Aug 13, 1977* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Laura Dupont Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
19 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,839 0 5 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,730 0 5 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,717 0 6 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,638 0 6 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6
33 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,591 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Laura Dupont Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9% 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Laura Dupont Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
19 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1977 1839 143.1 — — — — -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1978 1730 130.7 — — — — -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1979 1816 142.5 — — — — -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 1980 1718 128.9 — — — — -37 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 1981 1638 117.4 — — — — +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
33 1982 1593 108.3 — — — — +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1592 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 136.1 — — — — -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.